S&P 10,000: Why U.S. Equities Still Offer 60%+ Upside

Summary

Despite widespread caution among institutional investors, the S&P 500 has the potential to reach $10,000 by 2027 — a more than 60% upside from current levels. This non-consensus view is grounded in a combination of steady earnings growth, low long-term interest rates, and a behavioral shift in how investors value public markets relative to private assets. Current concerns — including tariffs, elections, and market concentration — are largely backward-looking. Beneath the surface, we’re witnessing a quiet but powerful rerating process as institutions realize the true earnings power and capital efficiency of the U.S. corporate sector. The market is entering a phase of rational exuberance, where a rising multiple on resilient earnings becomes not just possible, but mathematically justifiable.

Thesis

I. Markets Are Anchored to Old Heuristics Most investors believe a 20x P/E is expensive. But if the S&P can grow earnings at 6% per year, and your hurdle rate is 9%, then a fair P/E is 33x. This isn’t aggressive — it’s simple DCF math. That implies a future S&P 500 valuation over 10,000. The only reason we aren’t there yet is that markets are psychologically anchored to outdated valuation models. II. Earnings Are Resilient — and Global S&P 500 earnings have been surprisingly stable, even amid inflation, interest rate hikes, and geopolitical shocks. With the exception of short-term noise, earnings continue to grow at a healthy clip — supported by strong corporate balance sheets, global revenue bases, and capital-light business models. Even if tariffs reemerge, the impact is cushioned by geographic diversification and pricing power in key sectors like tech, pharma, and industrials. III. Public Equities Are a Bargain vs Private Markets Institutional capital is waking up to the fact that public markets offer higher liquidity, better transparency, and stronger cash flows than many recent-vintage private equity funds. PE and VC now look expensive relative to mega-cap tech — a reversal of the trend from 2010–2021. This sets the stage for capital reallocation back into U.S. equities, especially from institutions who have been underweight and are beginning to rethink their long-term models. IV. Behavioral Shifts Drive Market Reratings Investor psychology is primed for a phase shift. As more investors “do the math” and realize that a 30x multiple is reasonable in a low-rate, high-growth world, we get multiples expanding in a rational way. This isn’t speculative mania. It’s mathematically driven rerating, unfolding slowly, then suddenly. V. Interest Rates May Stay Lower Than Expected Despite all the noise about inflation and deficits, long-end bond yields have remained anchored. Investors’ fear of capital loss and preference for yield certainty means there is persistent demand for bonds, even at suboptimal real returns. Paradoxically, the uncertainty is helpful and keeps bond yields low. This suppresses the equity discount rate and supports higher valuation multiples — a key piece of the rerating puzzle.

Risks

1. Bond Yields Break Higher If 10-year yields break convincingly above 6%, the equity discount rate would rise, compressing valuation multiples and undermining the rerating thesis. So far, the bond market appears anchored — but this remains the biggest macro risk. 2. Earnings Disappointment A sharp downturn in S&P 500 earnings due to corporate uncertainty due to tariffs, or sector-specific headwinds (e.g., in tech or healthcare) could invalidate the growth-adjusted valuation logic. 3. Retail Euphoria Returns Too Fast If retail investors return in a speculative frenzy, pushing meme stocks and driving up risk metrics, the rally could become unstable and invite a correction before institutions finish rotating in.

📈 Price Targets

No price targets submitted with this view.

Tags

• Macro
• US
• Asset Allocation
• Private Equity